Seems like a well-intentioned approach, but it sort of defeats the purpose of a bestseller list! What do you think?
Read the article and leave your comments: Should We Set a Bestseller List Limit?
Thursday, July 14, 2011
Bestseller lists -- setting limits
Pulitzer Prize-winning Washington Post book columnist Michael Dirda suggests that bestseller lists serve to support established authors but do little to help less-established ones. His solution? “A writer can only be on the best-seller list once.”
Seems like a well-intentioned approach, but it sort of defeats the purpose of a bestseller list! What do you think?
Read the article and leave your comments: Should We Set a Bestseller List Limit?
Seems like a well-intentioned approach, but it sort of defeats the purpose of a bestseller list! What do you think?
Read the article and leave your comments: Should We Set a Bestseller List Limit?
